We won this case for a tenured-track professor with ten years research and teaching experience.  The applicant was a critical component to a U.S. Department of Energy funded project.  The applicant was also the key element to securing National Science Foundation funds for his employer.  His vast knowledge of inorganic chemistry and his unique multidisciplinary background was proven throughout his numerous recommendation letters offered by experts around the world.

We won this case based on the applicant's critical role in a key U.S. Air Force project.  His level of expertise in this specialized field was highly sought after and necessary to achieve the military's objectives.  We provided letters from experts in the Air Force stressing their need to keep the applicant on the project or else it would fail.

 

We won this case for an applicant with over thirteen years research and teaching experience.  His extraordinary talents and unique background as well as his vast knowledge in econometrics was shown by use of over six detailed recommendation letters.  This applicant had an extensive publication record and was frequently asked to present at international conferences.

We won this case for the applicant utilizing nine strong recommendation letters from sources around the world which included field experts as well as industry.

We won this case for the applicant who had eleven years teaching and research experience. Recommendation letters indicated that the applicant had a superb knowledge of not only theory but also economic technique.  The applicant was highly regarded by students, peers and experts in the field.  He was frequently called upon to review for the top, world-renowned journals in economics.

We won this case by providing strong recommendation letters and evidence of U.S. government support of this applicant's innovative research.  His previous scholarly publications and impressive presentations were just a few key elements to his unique background.  The FAA in particular was interested in the creative talents of this applicant.

This applicant had over twelve years of research experience. We noted the applicant's international reputation in the fourteen recommendation letters submitted.  The applicant was a member of a prestigious professional society membership of which requires noted achievements in the field.  We provided evidence of the extensive presentations the applicant made due to his level of expertise in the field.

We won this case for the applicant who had over twelve years research and teaching experience.  He was considered a critical component to the success of his current project.  At the time of filing, the applicant had over 22 publications in prestigious, international scholarly journals.  The applicant's significant contributions had been cited by other renowned researchers in his field.  His Ph.D. work was highly regarded and noted to be admired by several leading experts.

We won this case as the applicant was noted to be a critical component to the success of various projects and had a very large impact on the research program.  Referees described this applicant's talents to be rare and difficult to replace by U.S. workers.  Her original and pioneering research made her uniquely qualified to further this intrinsically important research which greatly effected the nation as a whole.

We won a case for National Interest Waiver for a Physician working in a medically underserved area.  We provided a five year contract, copy of his J-1 Waiver approval, numerous experience letters, a letter from the Department of State and documentation to reflect statistics of health professional shortage in the area.