Search

We won this case by submitting evidence of this applicant's substantial publication record as well as numerous recommendation letters which outlined the innovative work performed by the applicant.  In addition, referees described the applicant as "one of the best in the field" for his significant discoveries in the biological chemistry industry.  The applicant was employed with a very prestigious research institute which only hires the top scientists in the world.

 

We won this case for an applicant with over sixteen years research experience.  She had a substantial publication record.  Her expertise was sought for a collaboration with top researchers from the industry.  Her contributions to research and academics and her significant international recognition were described in detail in the ten exceptional recommendation letters.

We were able to provide evidence of this individual's membership in a prestigious professional society, international honors and numerous letters of recommendation from industries leading scientists.  This individual acted as a judge of the work of his research peers.  We were able to provide 15 letters of recommendation reflecting the innovative work performed by this applicant.  We also provided evidence to show the extensive citations of his findings.

We won this case based on the applicant's critical role in a key U.S. Air Force project.  His level of expertise in this specialized field was highly sought after and necessary to achieve the military's objectives.  We provided letters from experts in the Air Force stressing their need to keep the applicant on the project or else it would fail.

 

We won this case for a tenured-track professor with ten years research and teaching experience.  The applicant was a critical component to a U.S. Department of Energy funded project.  The applicant was also the key element to securing National Science Foundation funds for his employer.  His vast knowledge of inorganic chemistry and his unique multidisciplinary background was proven throughout his numerous recommendation letters offered by experts around the world.

We won this case for the applicant who is considered a leading expert in international affairs, particularly Indo-Chinese relations.  We utilized eight detailed recommendation letters which highlighted the importance of this applicant's vast knowledge on China and his outstanding expertise on nonproliferation and security affairs.  He had over twenty publications on this critical topic at the time of filing.

We won this case stressing the international scope of the extraordinary work that this applicant had done over the course of many years.  He was identified by experts around the world as belonging to the top 5% of scientists in his field.  His innovative and pioneering work was admired by his research peers around the globe.  Many U.S. educational institutes were seeking his services as a research professor.  This applicant was "invited" to present his research findings on countless occasions to an audience of the top researchers in the world.

We won this case by providing evidence of the impact of the work this applicant was conducting in her field.  Numerous referees provided detailed recommendation letters outlining the necessity for the continued efforts of this applicant.  Her teaching capabilities were noted as being far superior to others in her field. This applicant's unique background was shown to be scarce in the United States.

We won this case by providing strong recommendation letters and evidence of U.S. government support of this applicant's innovative research.  His previous scholarly publications and impressive presentations were just a few key elements to his unique background.  The FAA in particular was interested in the creative talents of this applicant.