Search

We won this case stressing the international scope of the extraordinary work that this applicant had done over the course of many years.  He was identified by experts around the world as belonging to the top 5% of scientists in his field.  His innovative and pioneering work was admired by his research peers around the globe.  Many U.S. educational institutes were seeking his services as a research professor.  This applicant was "invited" to present his research findings on countless occasions to an audience of the top researchers in the world.

We won this case by providing evidence of the impact of the work this applicant was conducting in her field.  Numerous referees provided detailed recommendation letters outlining the necessity for the continued efforts of this applicant.  Her teaching capabilities were noted as being far superior to others in her field. This applicant's unique background was shown to be scarce in the United States.

We won this case by providing strong recommendation letters and evidence of U.S. government support of this applicant's innovative research.  His previous scholarly publications and impressive presentations were just a few key elements to his unique background.  The FAA in particular was interested in the creative talents of this applicant.

We won this case for the applicant who had eleven years teaching and research experience. Recommendation letters indicated that the applicant had a superb knowledge of not only theory but also economic technique.  The applicant was highly regarded by students, peers and experts in the field.  He was frequently called upon to review for the top, world-renowned journals in economics.

We won this case for the applicant utilizing nine strong recommendation letters from sources around the world which included field experts as well as industry.

We won this case for an applicant with over thirteen years research and teaching experience.  His extraordinary talents and unique background as well as his vast knowledge in econometrics was shown by use of over six detailed recommendation letters.  This applicant had an extensive publication record and was frequently asked to present at international conferences.

We won this case for the applicant based on his exceptional research record evident by his numbers of publications and invited presentations.  At the time of filing, the applicant's research work had been cited over 100 times which is indicative of the high-quality, highly regarded work that he does.  Referees noted that this applicant was one of the very small percentage of scientists who achieve the highest level of success in their given field.

We won a case for National Interest Waiver for a Physician working in a medically underserved area.  We provided a five year contract, copy of his J-1 Waiver approval, numerous experience letters, a letter from the Department of State and documentation to reflect statistics of health professional shortage in the area.

We won this case as the applicant was noted to be a critical component to the success of various projects and had a very large impact on the research program.  Referees described this applicant's talents to be rare and difficult to replace by U.S. workers.  Her original and pioneering research made her uniquely qualified to further this intrinsically important research which greatly effected the nation as a whole.

We won this case for the applicant who had over twelve years research and teaching experience.  He was considered a critical component to the success of his current project.  At the time of filing, the applicant had over 22 publications in prestigious, international scholarly journals.  The applicant's significant contributions had been cited by other renowned researchers in his field.  His Ph.D. work was highly regarded and noted to be admired by several leading experts.

This applicant had over twelve years of research experience. We noted the applicant's international reputation in the fourteen recommendation letters submitted.  The applicant was a member of a prestigious professional society membership of which requires noted achievements in the field.  We provided evidence of the extensive presentations the applicant made due to his level of expertise in the field.