Search

We won this case by submitting evidence of this applicant's substantial publication record as well as numerous recommendation letters which outlined the innovative work performed by the applicant.  In addition, referees described the applicant as "one of the best in the field" for his significant discoveries in the biological chemistry industry.  The applicant was employed with a very prestigious research institute which only hires the top scientists in the world.
 

We won this case for an applicant with over sixteen years research experience.  She had a substantial publication record.  Her expertise was sought for a collaboration with top researchers from the industry.  Her contributions to research and academics and her significant international recognition were described in detail in the ten exceptional recommendation letters.

We were able to provide evidence of this individual's membership in a prestigious professional society, international honors and numerous letters of recommendation from industries leading scientists.  This individual acted as a judge of the work of his research peers.  We were able to provide 15 letters of recommendation reflecting the innovative work performed by this applicant.  We also provided evidence to show the extensive citations of his findings.

 We won this case following a response to a Request for Evidence. Service requested further clarification on the "permanency" of the job offer, which was with a University. We submitted the HR policies/procedures documentation to show that the position was permanent and met the Service requirements. Letters from the HR as well as the Department were submitted to show that the position would continue and that funding was available to support this position.

We won this case by providing strong recommendation letters and evidence of U.S. government support of this applicant's innovative research.  His previous scholarly publications and impressive presentations were just a few key elements to his unique background.  The FAA in particular was interested in the creative talents of this applicant.

We won this case for the applicant who had eleven years teaching and research experience. Recommendation letters indicated that the applicant had a superb knowledge of not only theory but also economic technique.  The applicant was highly regarded by students, peers and experts in the field.  He was frequently called upon to review for the top, world-renowned journals in economics.

We won this case for an applicant with over thirteen years research and teaching experience.  His extraordinary talents and unique background as well as his vast knowledge in econometrics was shown by use of over six detailed recommendation letters.  This applicant had an extensive publication record and was frequently asked to present at international conferences.

We won this case for a tenured-track professor with ten years research and teaching experience.  The applicant was a critical component to a U.S. Department of Energy funded project.  The applicant was also the key element to securing National Science Foundation funds for his employer.  His vast knowledge of inorganic chemistry and his unique multidisciplinary background was proven throughout his numerous recommendation letters offered by experts around the world.

We won this case for the applicant who is considered a leading expert in international affairs, particularly Indo-Chinese relations.  We utilized eight detailed recommendation letters which highlighted the importance of this applicant's vast knowledge on China and his outstanding expertise on nonproliferation and security affairs.  He had over twenty publications on this critical topic at the time of filing.

We won this case stressing the international scope of the extraordinary work that this applicant had done over the course of many years.  He was identified by experts around the world as belonging to the top 5% of scientists in his field.  His innovative and pioneering work was admired by his research peers around the globe.  Many U.S. educational institutes were seeking his services as a research professor.  This applicant was "invited" to present his research findings on countless occasions to an audience of the top researchers in the world.

We won this case by providing evidence of the impact of the work this applicant was conducting in her field.  Numerous referees provided detailed recommendation letters outlining the necessity for the continued efforts of this applicant.  Her teaching capabilities were noted as being far superior to others in her field. This applicant's unique background was shown to be scarce in the United States.

We won this case for the applicant based on his exceptional research record evident by his numbers of publications and invited presentations.  At the time of filing, the applicant's research work had been cited over 100 times which is indicative of the high-quality, highly regarded work that he does.  Referees noted that this applicant was one of the very small percentage of scientists who achieve the highest level of success in their given field.

We won this case for the applicant who had over twelve years research and teaching experience.  He was considered a critical component to the success of his current project.  At the time of filing, the applicant had over 22 publications in prestigious, international scholarly journals.  The applicant's significant contributions had been cited by other renowned researchers in his field.  His Ph.D. work was highly regarded and noted to be admired by several leading experts.

This applicant had over twelve years of research experience. We noted the applicant's international reputation in the fourteen recommendation letters submitted.  The applicant was a member of a prestigious professional society membership of which requires noted achievements in the field.  We provided evidence of the extensive presentations the applicant made due to his level of expertise in the field.

We won a case for a Ph.D. in Organic Chemistry as an Outstanding Researcher. This applicant had over 22 years of research experience in the field and was a noted expert. We submitted documentary evidence to show his multiple patents and the commercialization of his patented work. We also provided extensive documentation to show his significant publication record and the multitude of citations resulting from his innovative and pioneering work. This applicant also qualified as a reviewer for several international scientific journals.

We won a case for a surgeon who had over 31 years of research, teaching and surgical experience. This applicant was highly qualified and known in the field to be one of the few that have reached the highest level of success. He was very well published with over 90 publications and authorship of a multitude of book chapters. We provided extensive documentary evidence to show that he was one of the premier surgeons in his expertise. This applicant was frequently called upon as an invited speaker and presented his work worldwide.

We won a case for a Materials Scientist who had over 11 years of research experience. His expertise was in the field of solar and hydrogen powered energy. We provided documentary evidence to show that his extensive list of publications was in prestigious international journals with high impact factors. We also showed that as a result of his innovative and pioneering work, he was invited to present his findings at a large number of conferences/workshops and symposia.

This applicant had over 5 years of industry experience and 8 years of research experience. He was offered a job with a private company conducting antennae and microwave engineering research. His unique skills set him apart from other researchers in the field and as a result he received several significant awards for his outstanding achievement. He also published for the prestigious society, IEEE.

 We won this case following a Request for Evidence, which included requests for further documentary evidence to show that the grant awards received were considered "highly competitive" and awarded based on the applicant's outstanding achievements. We provided documentation to show that the applicant was featured in major media for his innovative work. We provided additional expert letters that reiterated the applicant truly stood out amongst his peers and more than qualified for the category.

To give you folks an idea of what gets through easily. We won a case for a chemist with over 14 years of teaching and research experience. This applicant was the author of over 63 peer-reviewed research publications and presented his work at 17 conferences and symposia. He was also invited to present at a multitude of seminars. This applicant authored 5 book chapters and technical proceedings. He qualified for the category based on his extensive publication record as well as his acting as a judge of others' work.

We won this case following a response to a Request for Evidence. Service requested further clarification on the "permanency" of the job offer, which was with a University. We submitted an official job offer letter as well as the copies of the university personnel manual and administrative handbook. Service had requested additional evidence to show "international reputation" of the applicant.